doc: update FAQ

This commit is contained in:
Miroslav Lichvar 2014-06-30 16:21:42 +02:00
parent d46d7ad947
commit 698404b02f

View file

@ -4487,7 +4487,7 @@ command is issued.
@menu
* Administrative issues::
* Chrony compared to other programs::
* Selection of NTP servers::
* Configuration::
* Computer is not synchronising::
* Issues with chronyc::
* Real-time clock issues::
@ -4507,8 +4507,9 @@ For the current development from the developers' version control system see the
@code{Git} link on the web site.
@subsection Are there any packaged versions of chrony?
We are aware of packages for Debian, Fedora, Gentoo, Mandriva, Slackware, and
Ubuntu. We are not involved with how these are built or distributed.
We are aware of packages for Arch, Debian, Fedora, Gentoo, Mandriva, Slackware,
Ubuntu, FreeBSD and NetBSD. We are not involved with how these are built or
distributed.
@subsection Where is the home page?
It is currently at
@ -4534,25 +4535,25 @@ BSD-like license.
@c {{{ S:Chrony compared to other programs
@node Chrony compared to other programs
@section Chrony compared to other programs
@subsection How does chrony compare to xntpd?
If your computer is permenently connected, or connected for long periods (that
is, for the several hours it takes xntpd to settle down), or you need to
support hardware reference clocks to your computer, then xntpd will work fine.
Apart from not supporting hardware clocks, chrony will work fine too.
@subsection How does chrony compare to ntpd?
Chrony can usually synchronise the system clock faster and with better time
accuracy, but it doesn't implement all NTP features, e.g. broadcast/multicast
mode, or authentication based on public-key cryptography. For a more detailed
comparison, see section @code{Comparison with ntpd} in the manual.
If your computer connects to the 'net for 5 minutes once a day (or something
like that), or you turn your Linux computer off when you're not using it, or
you want to use NTP on an isolated network with no hardware clocks in sight,
chrony will work much better for you.
If your computer connects to the 'net only for few minutes at a time, you turn
your Linux computer off or suspend it frequently, the clock is not very stable
(e.g. it is a virtual machine), or you want to use NTP on an isolated network
with no hardware clocks in sight, chrony will probably work much better for
you.
The reason I wrote chrony was that I could not get xntpd to do anything
sensible on my PC at home, which is connected to the 'net for about 5 minutes
once or twice a day, mainly to upload/download email and news. Nowadays it is
also turned off for 22-23 hours a day, when not in use. I wanted a program
which would
The original reason chrony was written was that ntpd (called xntpd at the
time) could not to do anything sensible on a PC which was connected to
the 'net only for about 5 minutes once or twice a day, mainly to
upload/download email and news. The requirements were
@itemize @bullet
@item slew the time to correct it when I go online and NTP servers become
@item slew the time to correct it when going online and NTP servers become
visible
@item determine the rate at which the computer gains or loses time and use this
information to keep it reasonably correct between connects to the 'net. This
@ -4561,22 +4562,21 @@ availability of the references or the fact the computer is turned off between
groups of measurements.
@item maintain the time across reboots, by working out the error and drift rate
of the computer's real-time clock and using this information to set the system
clock correctly at boot up. (In the last few months, it became impossible for
me to leave my computer powered permanently.)
clock correctly at boot up.
@end itemize
Also, when working with isolated networks with no true time references
at all, I found xntpd gave me no help with managing the local clock's
gain/loss rate on the NTP master node (which I set from my watch). I
added some automated support in chrony to deal with this.
Also, when working with isolated networks with no true time references at all
ntpd was found to give no help with managing the local clock's gain/loss rate
on the NTP master node (which was set from watch). Some automated support was
added to chrony to deal with this.
@c }}}
@c {{{ S:Selection of NTP servers
@node Selection of NTP servers
@section Selection of NTP servers
@c {{{ S:Configuration
@node Configuration
@section Configuration
@subsection I have several computers on a LAN. Should I make one the master, or make them all clients of an external server?
I think the best configuration is to make one computer the master, with the
@subsection I have several computers on a LAN. Should be all clients of an external server?
The best configuration is usually to make one computer the master, with the
others as clients of it. Add a @code{local} directive to the master's
chrony.conf file. This configuration will be better because
@ -4587,6 +4587,28 @@ chrony.conf file. This configuration will be better because
maintain a common time with each other.
@end itemize
@subsection Must I specify servers by IP address if DNS is not available on chronyd start?
No. Starting from version 1.25, @code{chronyd} will keep trying to resolve the
hostnames specified in the @code{server} and @code{peer} directives in
increasing intervals until it succeeds. The @code{online} command can be
issued from @code{chronyc} to try to resolve them immediately.
@subsection How can I make chronyd more secure?
If you don't need to serve time to NTP clients, you can add @code{port 0} to
the @file{chrony.conf} file to disable the NTP server/peer sockets and prevent
NTP requests from reaching @code{chronyd}.
If you don't need to use @code{chronyc} remotely, you can add the following
directives to the configuration file to bind the command sockets to the
loopback interface
@example
bindcmdaddress 127.0.0.1
bindcmdaddress ::1
@end example
If you don't need to use @code{chronyc} at all, you can disable the command
sockets by adding @code{cmdport 0} to the configuration file.
@c }}}
@c {{{ S:Computer is not synchronising
@node Computer is not synchronising
@ -4597,16 +4619,13 @@ following questions.
@subsection Behind a firewall?
If there is a firewall between you and the NTP server you're trying to use,
the packets may be blocked. Try using a tool like etherfind or tcpdump to see
the packets may be blocked. Try using a tool like wireshark or tcpdump to see
if you're getting responses from the server. If you have an external modem,
see if the receive light blinks straight after the transmit light (when the
link is quiet apart from the NTP traffic.) Try adding @code{log measurements}
to the @file{chrony.conf} file and look in the measurements.log file after
chrony has been running for a short period. See if any measurements appear.
Most people run chronyd on the firewall itself, to avoid all issues of UDP
packet forwarding and/or masquerading.
@subsection Do you have a non-permanent (i.e. intermittent) Internet connection?
Check that you're using chronyc's @code{online} and @code{offline} commands
appropriately. Again, check in measurements.log to see if you're getting any
@ -4622,21 +4641,21 @@ will arise. You should always make X quite high (e.g. 10) in this directive.
@section Issues with chronyc
@subsection I keep getting the error @code{506 Cannot talk to daemon}
Make sure that the @file{chrony.conf} file (on the computer where chronyd is
running) has a @code{cmdallow} entry for the computer you are running chronyc
on. This isn't necessary for localhost.
Make sure that the @file{chrony.conf} file (on the computer where
@code{chronyd} is running) has a @code{cmdallow} entry for the computer you are
running @code{chronyc} on. This isn't necessary for localhost.
Perhaps chronyd is not running. Try using the ps command (e.g. on Linux, 'ps
-auxw') to see if it's running. Or try 'netstat -a' and see if the ports
123/udp and 323/udp are listening. If @code{chronyd} is not running, you may
have a problem with the way you are trying to start it (e.g. at boot time).
Perhaps @code{chronyd} is not running. Try using the ps command (e.g. on
Linux, 'ps -auxw') to see if it's running. Or try 'netstat -a' and see if the
ports 123/udp and 323/udp are listening. If @code{chronyd} is not running, you
may have a problem with the way you are trying to start it (e.g. at boot time).
Perhaps you have a firewall set up in a way that blocks packets on port
323/udp. You need to amend the firewall configuration in this case.
@subsection Is the chronyc<->chronyd protocol documented anywhere?
Only by the source code :-) See cmdmon.c (chronyd side) and client.c (chronyc
side).
Only by the source code :-) See cmdmon.c (@code{chronyd} side) and client.c
(@code{chronyc} side).
@c }}}
@c {{{ S:Real-time clock issues
@node Real-time clock issues
@ -4653,13 +4672,13 @@ details.
The hwclock program is often set-up by default in the boot and shutdown scripts
with many Linux installations. If you want to use chronyd's real-time clock
support, the important thing is to disable hwclock in the shutdown procedure.
If you don't, it will over-write the RTC with a new value, unknown to chronyd.
At the next reboot, chronyd will compensate this (wrong) time with its estimate
of how far the RTC has drifted whilst the power was off, giving a meaningless
initial system time.
If you don't, it will over-write the RTC with a new value, unknown to
@code{chronyd}. At the next reboot, @code{chronyd} will compensate this (wrong)
time with its estimate of how far the RTC has drifted whilst the power was off,
giving a meaningless initial system time.
There is no need to remove hwclock from the boot process, as long as chronyd is
started after it has run.
There is no need to remove hwclock from the boot process, as long as
@code{chronyd} is started after it has run.
@subsection I just keep getting the '513 RTC driver not running' message
For the real time clock support to work, you need the following three things
@ -4674,50 +4693,34 @@ For the real time clock support to work, you need the following three things
@section Microsoft Windows
@subsection Does chrony support Windows?
No. The chronyc program (the command-line client used for configuring
chronyd while it is running) has been successfully built and run under Cygwin
in the past. chronyd is not portable, because part of it is very
No. The @code{chronyc} program (the command-line client used for configuring
@code{chronyd} while it is running) has been successfully built and run under
Cygwin in the past. @code{chronyd} is not portable, because part of it is very
system-dependent. It needs adapting to work with Windows' equivalent of the
adjtimex() call, and it needs to be made to work as an NT service.
@subsection Are there any plans to support Windows?
We have no plans to do this. Anyone is welcome to pick this work up and
contribute it back to the project.
@subsection What alternative NTP clients are there for Windows?
Some of the names we've seen mentioned are
@itemize @bullet
@item Automachron
@item NetTime (nettime.sourceforge.net)
@end itemize
@c }}}
@c {{{ S:NTP-specific issues
@node NTP-specific issues
@section NTP-specific issues
@subsection Can chrony be driven from broadcast NTP servers?
No. I remember looking at how they worked when I was first writing chrony.
Since the 'target market' then was dial-up systems, broadcast packets were not
relevant so I didn't bother working out how to deal with the complexities of
doing the delay estimation.
I no longer have root access to a LAN environment to develop and test broadcast
server support. Neither have I the time to work on this. I would be very
happy to accept a patch from anyone who can develop, test and debug the
necessary changes!
No, this NTP mode is not implemented yet.
@subsection Can chronyd transmit broadcast NTP packets (e.g. to synchronise other computers on a private LAN)?
Yes. Starting from version 1.17, chrony has this capability.
@subsection Can chrony keep the system clock a fixed offset away from real time?
I have not experimented much, but I don't believe this would be possible as
the program currently stands.
This is not possible as the program currently stands.
@subsection What happens if the network connection is dropped without using chronyc's 'offline' command first?
In this case chronyd will keep trying to access the server(s) that it thinks
are online. Eventually it will decide that they are unreachable and no longer
consider itself synchronised to them. If you have other computers on your LAN
accessing the computer that is affected this way, they too will become
In this case @code{chronyd} will keep trying to access the server(s) that it
thinks are online. Eventually it will decide that they are unreachable and no
longer consider itself synchronised to them. If you have other computers on
your LAN accessing the computer that is affected this way, they too will become
'unsynchronised', unless you have the 'local' directive set up on the master
computer.
@ -4728,17 +4731,8 @@ useful to avoid this situation.
@node Linux-specific issues
@section Linux-specific issues
@subsection Why does the source code include kernel header files?
The program needs to see the definitions of structures used to interact with
the real time clock (via /dev/rtc) and with the adjtimex() system call. Sadly
this has led to a number of compilation problems with newer kernels which have
been increasingly hard to fix in a way that makes the code compilable on all
Linux kernel versions. Hopefully
the situation will not deteriorate further with future kernel versions.
@subsection I get "Could not open /dev/rtc, Device or resource busy" in my syslog file
Check that you haven't accidentally got two copies of chronyd running (perhaps
defined in different start-up scripts.)
Some other program running on the system may be using the device.
@c }}}
@c {{{ S:Solaris-specific issues
@node Solaris-specific issues
@ -4748,10 +4742,9 @@ defined in different start-up scripts.)
(The dosynctodr variable controls whether Solaris couples the equivalent of its
BIOS clock into its system clock at regular intervals). The Solaris port of
chrony was developed in the Solaris 2.5 era. Some aspect of the Solaris kernel
has changed which prevents the same technique working. I no longer have root
access to any Solaris machines to work on this, and am reliant on somebody
developing the patch and testing it. A good starting point would be to see if
xntpd has been modified to work for Solaris 2.8.
has changed which prevents the same technique working. We no longer have root
access to any Solaris machines to work on this, and we are reliant on somebody
developing the patch and testing it.
@c }}}
@c }}}
@c {{{ apx:GNU General Public License