refclock: require new samples to have newer timestamp
If all or most SHM/SOCK samples collected in a polling interval had the same local timestamp, the dispersion could end up as nan, which could trigger an assert failure later in the code. Before accumulating a refclock sample, check if the timestamp is newer than the previous one.
This commit is contained in:
parent
9c48166e90
commit
8f85291d23
1 changed files with 11 additions and 5 deletions
16
refclock.c
16
refclock.c
|
@ -505,16 +505,22 @@ RCL_AddPulse(RCL_Instance instance, struct timespec *pulse_time, double second)
|
|||
static int
|
||||
valid_sample_time(RCL_Instance instance, struct timespec *ts)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct timespec raw_time;
|
||||
double diff;
|
||||
struct timespec raw_time, last_sample_time;
|
||||
double diff, last_offset, last_dispersion;
|
||||
|
||||
LCL_ReadRawTime(&raw_time);
|
||||
diff = UTI_DiffTimespecsToDouble(&raw_time, ts);
|
||||
if (diff < 0.0 || diff > UTI_Log2ToDouble(instance->poll + 1)) {
|
||||
DEBUG_LOG(LOGF_Refclock, "%s refclock sample not valid age=%.6f ts=%s",
|
||||
UTI_RefidToString(instance->ref_id), diff, UTI_TimespecToString(ts));
|
||||
|
||||
if (diff < 0.0 || diff > UTI_Log2ToDouble(instance->poll + 1) ||
|
||||
(filter_get_last_sample(&instance->filter, &last_sample_time,
|
||||
&last_offset, &last_dispersion) &&
|
||||
UTI_CompareTimespecs(&last_sample_time, ts) >= 0)) {
|
||||
DEBUG_LOG(LOGF_Refclock, "%s refclock sample not valid age=%.6f ts=%s lastts=%s",
|
||||
UTI_RefidToString(instance->ref_id), diff,
|
||||
UTI_TimespecToString(ts), UTI_TimespecToString(&last_sample_time));
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue